Lesson
Plan Two:
A Brief Overview of the Asylum and Deinstitutionalization
Historical Background
Questions
Research Projects
Take Action Projects
References
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Introduction
The history of psychiatric institutional care begins in the 8th Century
and the Islamic world of the Middle East and North Africa. In keeping
with a belief that God loved insane people, asylums that offered patients
special diets, baths, drugs, music, and pleasant surroundings were established
in Baghdad, Cairo, Damascus, and Fez.
Conditions in Europe were very different. Throughout the Middle Ages,
the Renaissance, and the Enlightenment, mentally ill persons were subjected
to horrendous conditions. For example, the Hospital of Saint Mary of
Bethlehem in London, which first admitted patients with mental illness
in about 1402, was infamous for its brutal and inhumane treatment of
inmates. By the 16th century, its nickname Bedlam
signified any asylum or person who was mad.
A relatively brief period of improved care started in the late 18th
century, when Jean-Baptiste Pussin, superintendent of a ward for incurable
mental patients at La Bicêtre hospital in Paris, prohibited beatings
and released patients from shackles. In 1793, Phillipe Pinel became
chief physician at La Bicêtre, and he continued these reforms.
He developed moral treatment, a form of care that offered
patients sympathy and kindness rather than cruelty and violence. In
1796, William Tuke established a model of compassionate care in rural
England the York Retreat where people with severe mental illnesses
were able to rest, talk about their problems, and work. Practices in
North America followed suit and, between 1817 and 1828, a number of
modern mental institutions opened.
This period of benevolence did not continue for long. Care in psychiatric
institutions deteriorated to mere custodial functions that provided
patients with the bare requirements of subsistence in environments that
were generally overcrowded and unhealthy. These conditions predominated
in the mental hospitals of North America and Europe from the latter
half of the 19th Century until the middle of the 20th.
Deinstitutionalization in the United States
Beginning in the 1950s there was an effort throughout the United States
to remove long-term patients from psychiatric facilities and place them
in community-based treatment programs. The impetus of this deinstitutionalization
movement came from a convergence of several social forces. First, with
the successes in treating soldiers traumatized by their experiences
in World War II, psychiatrists become optimistic about their ability
to effectively treat mental disorders outside of hospital settings.
Second, there was a growing feeling that the abusive conditions found
in most state psychiatric hospitals, and the negative effects of long-term
institutionalization, were at least as harmful as chronic mental illness
itself. Many came to believe that the civil rights of people with mental
illness were violated. Third, fiscal conservatives in the government
were concerned with the enormous expense of caring for patients in large
institutions. And finally, in 1954, the discovery of chlorpromazine,
the first effective anti-psychotic medication, made it reasonably possible
to manage the care of persons with chronic mental illness outside the
hospital.
All together, these forces brought about a dramatic shift in admission
and discharge practices at state and county psychiatric hospitals. The
effects of these changes can be seen in the following data: in 1955,
559,000 patients were living in state and county psychiatric hospitals
throughout the country. In 1980, only 138,000 people were living in
such facilities.
The Effects of Deinstitutionalization
By virtually all accounts, the deinstitutionalization movement in the
United States has been an utter disaster. Sociologist Christopher Jencks
notes that good care is expensive, whether it takes place in a hospital
or in the community.
Deinstitutionalization saves big money only when it is followed
by gross neglect. In addition, the term deinstitutionalization,
as it is applied in the United States, is a misnomer. Dehospitalization
is a more accurate way to describe what took place. While long-term
patients were discharged, short-term inpatient care increased. That
is, the locus of care for those suffering from chronic mental illness
did not change so much as patterns of care. Many patients were merely
reinstitutionalized, placed in such settings as nursing homes and board-and-care
facilities. Others were relegated to temporary shelters or single-room
occupancy (SRO's) hotels. Worst of all, the criminal justice system
has, for many persons, taken on the role of the old state hospitals.
Citing jail as possibly "our most enduring asylum," Katherine
Briar-Lawson, Dean of the School of Social Welfare at the University
of Albany, has written:
"When traditional pathways of care are blocked, the local jail
becomes the recycling station for some deinstitutionalized persons.
Like the old asylums, the jail increasingly functions as the one place
in town where troubled persons can be deposited by law enforcement
officers and not be turned away."
Recent estimates suggest that between 6 and 15 percent of those in
city and county jails, and 10 to 15 percent of those in state prisons
are suffering from severe mental illness. Indeed, the Los Angeles County
Jail has been identified as the largest mental institution in the United
States.
Since the 1970s, there has been fierce debate over whether deinstitutionalization
has been a direct cause of homelessness among persons with chronic mental
illness who comprise only about one-quarter to one-third of the
entire homeless population. One of the best accounts of the policies
that brought about deinstitutionalization can be found in Jencks
book, The Homeless . We recommend that students and teachers
read this account to get a fuller understanding of the issues.
In brief, there are two essential points to remember when considering
the issues above. First, although the deinstitutionalization process
began in the mid-1950s, a disproportionate number of mentally
ill persons only began to appear among the homeless population in the
mid-1970s. This lag of twenty years makes it impossible to claim
that deinstitutionalization was the sole cause of homelessness among
persons with chronic mental illness. Second, as originally planned,
deinstitutionalization was to take place in conjunction with the establishment
of community mental health programs that would take on the responsibility
for the treatment of persons with chronic mental illness. President
Kennedy signed the Community Mental Health Center Act in October 1963,
which allocated federal funds to community clinics if they provided
a full range of services, including out-patient, in-patient, and crisis
services to persons with mental illness. However, these comprehensive
community mental health centers were never adequately developed; neither
were the supportive services (e.g., housing and rehabilitation programs)
that are necessary for maintaining individuals in the community. Thus,
neglect in the community took the place of abuse in the asylum.
QUESTIONS
1. From the depiction in Imagining Robert, do you think Robert
was provided with "moral treatment" or "compassionate
care" during any of his hospitalizations? What is your impression
of the quality of care that Robert did receive?
2. Describe what is meant by custodial care. What factors do you think
led to the deterioration of care provided in psychiatric hospitals?
3. In the film Jay said,
"He's basically been in city hospitals, state hospitals, emergency
wards, half-way houses, for 37 years now. The last 6 years he's been
in this one hospital on isolation most of the time, day after day
after day. . .And Hillside was the first place where Robert stayed
long term. And this was the first of many. After this you were at
Creedmoor on and off for four and a half years. You were at Mid-Hudson
Psychiatric Center. . .You were at South Beach for many years. Gracie
Square. Bronx Psychiatric Center. . .in between a lot of SROs."
How do you think the implementation of deinstitutionalization in New
York affected decisions made about Robert's treatment?
4. How might living in a psychiatric institution for years at a time
affect a person's behaviors, attitudes, self-esteem, and hopes for the
future? How might it affect a person's socialization skills? What do
you think has been the impact on Robert of his many hospitalizations?
5. How might long-term hospitalization affect the family of a person
with chronic mental illness?
6. What is meant by the civil rights of patients? Based on the information
in the film, do you think any of Robert's civil rights were violated
when he was hospitalized?
7. How do financial concerns shape mental health policies?
8. Community programs can only be effective if people use their services.
Why might a person with chronic mental illness choose not to go for
treatment or decide to discontinue taking medication? Debate the pros
and cons of whether people with severe mental illness should be forced
to take medication.
9. What are the reasons that people become homeless? How might mental
illness play a role? Do you think it is the most important factor?
10. How has jail become a replacement for asylums?
11. Who do you think needs to be included in decisions about the implementation
of community programs for the chronically mentally ill? For example,
how might you include police and judges? What should be provided for
the families of those with chronic mental illness?
RESEARCH PROJECTS
1. It is now recognized that people with chronic mental illness have
a number of specific rights. What is meant by: the right to receive
treatment, the right to refuse treatment, informed consent, and the
right to receive the "least restrictive treatment" available?
Learn about the Wyatt v. Stickney and the Lynch v. Baxley
cases.
2. Where are persons with severe mental illness hospitalized in your
community? How long have these psychiatric hospitals/units existed?
Are they public or private? What is the cost of hospitalization in each?
3. What is the average stay of a patient on the inpatient psychiatric
units in your area? What was the average stay ten years ago? Thirty
years ago? What do you think has brought about these changes?
4. How many state-run psychiatric hospitals are there in your state?
What is the current census? How many state-run hospitals were there
in 1960? What was the census then? Learn more about one state-run psychiatric
hospital, Northampton State Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts, at
the following website: www.1856.org
5. What is your health coverage for the treatment of severe mental
illness? How does it compare to your medical coverage for physical illness?
Where would you seek care for mental illness if you had no insurance?
6. What does parity mean for health insurance coverage? What is the
status of parity legislation in your state?
7. Where do persons with severe mental illness live in your community?
Are there half-way houses, independent living arrangements, foster families,
nursing homes, SRO's, etc? Where are they located? Who funds these programs?
How much does each living situation cost? Are there time-limits for
length of stay? Learn more about Project Renewal, Robert's current home,
at: www.projectrenewal.org
8. What kinds of community mental health programs are there in your
community? For example, is there a 24-hour crisis service, a day or
partial hospitalization program, etc.? Are vocational and rehabilitation
programs provided? Where are they located?
9. What is the NIMBY effect? What has been the impact of this attitude?
Use newspapers, minutes of city council meetings, etc. to find out whether
there were controversies when community programs were first proposed
in your area. See the articles about conditions of homes for the mentally
ill in New York referred to in Lesson Plan 1.
10. What is the Clubhouse movement? Learn more about Fountain House,
the clubhouse in which Robert participates, at: www.fountainhouse.org
11. What is the "revolving door" syndrome? How did it come
about because of deinstitutionalization?
TAKE ACTION PROJECTS
Students can become advocates for persons with mental illness in a
variety of ways:
1. Students can volunteer to work in programs for people who are mentally
ill.
2. What ideas can students generate for providing education and information
that might change the attitude of NIMBY? How might they implement these
ideas?
3. Since care for persons with mental illness is now in the community,
rather than in hospitals, mentally ill persons and their advocates have
become more visible and powerful. Have students learn what forms of
advocacy are taking place by attending meetings of advocacy and consumer
groups. They can use what they learn to become involved in campaigns
to end discrimination and stigma, increase funding for treatment and
research, and widen access to supportive services in the community.
The following sites will also be helpful:
National Mental Health Consumer's Self-Help Clearinghouse
www.mhselfhelp.org
National Mental Health Association
www.nmha.org
National Alliance for the Mentally Ill
www.nami.org
REFERENCES
Andrews, J., Briggs, A., Porter, R., Tucker, P., & Waddington,
K. (1997). The History of Bethlem. London: Routledge.
Briar, K. H. (1983). Jails: neglected asylums. Social Casework,
64, 387-393.
Butterfield, F. (March 5, 1998). Asylums behind bars: a special report;
prisons replace hospitals for the nation's mentally ill. New York
Times. (This article can also be found at: http://www.nami.org/update/980305.html)
Goldman, H. H., Adams, N. H., & Taube, C. A. (1983). Deinstitutionalization:
The data demythologized. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34,
129-134.
Greenblatt, M. (1992). Deinstitutionalization and reinstitutionalization
of the mentally ill. In M. J. Robertson & M. Greenblatt (Eds.),
Homelessness: a national perspective (pp. 47-56). New York: Plenum
Press.
Grob, G. N. (1994). The mad among us: A history of the care of America's
mentally ill. New York: Free Press.
Jencks, C. (1994). The homeless. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Lamb, H. R., & Weinberger, L. E. (1998). Persons with severe mental
illness in jails and prisons: a review. Psychiatric Services,
49(4), 483-492.
Mora, G. (1980). Historical and theoretical trends in psychiatry. In
H. I. Kaplan & A. M. Freedman & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive
text book of psychiatry/III (pp. 4-98). Baltimore: Williams and
Wilkins.
Reich, R., & Siegel, L. (1978). The emergence of the Bowery as
a psychiatric dumping ground. Psychiatric Quarterly, 50, 191-201.
Segal, S. P., Baumohl, J., & Johnson, E. (1977). Falling through
the cracks: Mental disorder and social margin in a young vagrant population.
Social Problems, 24, 387-400.
Tuke, S. (1813). Description of the Retreat, an institution near
York, for insane persons of the Society of Friends: containing an account
of its origin and progress, the modes of treatment, and a statement
of cases. York: W. Alexander.
Weiner, D. B. (1992). Philippe Pinel's "Memoir on Madness"
of December 11, 1794: a fundamental text of modern psychiatry. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 725-732.
|